It shocks me that the figure representing women is drawn up smaller than the male image. With all the people across the world there are no indications that there is an average of men being taller than women. And more importantly, It makes is seem like the woman is standing behind the man. Appalling! I welcome that toilettes in many places are changed to Uni-sex toilettes. A way to eliminate Gender separation. The two categories, if kept apart and separated with distinct lines poses many problematic issues. That women and men are inherently different with inherent characteristics. In the end this causes all people that do not fit this description to feel ostracised and possibly discriminated. And moreover, the evidence that there are not only two gender categories are there. Many people are born inter-sexed and only because of the hetero-normative world forced to choose. No need to create specific toilettes for this group of people, just make all toilettes unisex. And for the argument that mens toilettes are dirtier than women's due to the spray factor of standing up and peeing... Women float as well. Peeing all over the seat. Pissoirs are meant to accommodate standing pissers of all gender categories, toilette bowls are not. Therefore this is a message to all: Sit down!
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Weird form of Heteronormativity
Here is a picture taken at SOL, the language and litteratur department at the Lund University, Sweden.

It shocks me that the figure representing women is drawn up smaller than the male image. With all the people across the world there are no indications that there is an average of men being taller than women. And more importantly, It makes is seem like the woman is standing behind the man. Appalling! I welcome that toilettes in many places are changed to Uni-sex toilettes. A way to eliminate Gender separation. The two categories, if kept apart and separated with distinct lines poses many problematic issues. That women and men are inherently different with inherent characteristics. In the end this causes all people that do not fit this description to feel ostracised and possibly discriminated. And moreover, the evidence that there are not only two gender categories are there. Many people are born inter-sexed and only because of the hetero-normative world forced to choose. No need to create specific toilettes for this group of people, just make all toilettes unisex. And for the argument that mens toilettes are dirtier than women's due to the spray factor of standing up and peeing... Women float as well. Peeing all over the seat. Pissoirs are meant to accommodate standing pissers of all gender categories, toilette bowls are not. Therefore this is a message to all: Sit down!
It shocks me that the figure representing women is drawn up smaller than the male image. With all the people across the world there are no indications that there is an average of men being taller than women. And more importantly, It makes is seem like the woman is standing behind the man. Appalling! I welcome that toilettes in many places are changed to Uni-sex toilettes. A way to eliminate Gender separation. The two categories, if kept apart and separated with distinct lines poses many problematic issues. That women and men are inherently different with inherent characteristics. In the end this causes all people that do not fit this description to feel ostracised and possibly discriminated. And moreover, the evidence that there are not only two gender categories are there. Many people are born inter-sexed and only because of the hetero-normative world forced to choose. No need to create specific toilettes for this group of people, just make all toilettes unisex. And for the argument that mens toilettes are dirtier than women's due to the spray factor of standing up and peeing... Women float as well. Peeing all over the seat. Pissoirs are meant to accommodate standing pissers of all gender categories, toilette bowls are not. Therefore this is a message to all: Sit down!
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Wominnovation
Some innovations help women more than others
Mar 9th 2010 | From The Economist online

TWO recent innovations have garnered a lot of attention for the way they empower women. One is microcredit, a system of lending to very poor people, the majority of whom are female microentrepreneurs who are thus helped to climb out of poverty. The other is the mobile phone, which among other things has led to the emergence of an army of “telephone ladies” in countries such as Bangladesh, who earn a decent living by buying a phone and renting it out to other villagers.
That said, some innovations have been harmful to women, especially in the developing world. As the cover story of the latest issue of The Economist points out, at least 100m female lives have been lost in recent decades due to “gendercide” in countries such as China, where the number of live male births recorded enormously exceeds the number of live female births. One factor in this has been new technology that allows parents to determine their embryo’s sex early in a pregnancy—and thus to abort females in countries where male offspring are valued more highly. Other innovations also bring more benefits to men than women. For example, women are estimated to be only 25% of internet users in Africa, 22% in Asia, 38% in Latin America and just 6% in the Middle East.
“How can we harness innovation’s power to empower women and promote greater gender equality?” asks a new study by the International Centre for Research on Women. Its authors try to answer this question first by examining eight inventions that they say have helped women dramatically, including village mobile phones and microcredit.
Another example is the birth-control pill: there is a strong case to be made that it has brought more benefits for women than any other invention, although the report does not attempt such a ranking. The automatic washing-machine might give it a close run in countries where it is commonplace, by freeing women from an activity that used to take many hours a week. Instead of studying that, the report instead considers a number of “social innovations”, ranging from land titling in Peru to the successful anti-foot-binding campaign in China, that the authors say have had a massive beneficial impact.
What makes for a successful pro-women innovation? The report says it is usually the confluence of several positive factors. As with all innovation, a good idea is not enough in itself: it also needs a favourable context, including political, economic and social conditions that make the time right for its adoption, and an innovation system that excels at finding and testing good ideas and quickly scaling them up. But the invention must also have an inherent value that compels women to embrace it—such as the power the Pill gave women over the decision to become pregnant.
Full article on economist.com
Mar 9th 2010 | From The Economist online

TWO recent innovations have garnered a lot of attention for the way they empower women. One is microcredit, a system of lending to very poor people, the majority of whom are female microentrepreneurs who are thus helped to climb out of poverty. The other is the mobile phone, which among other things has led to the emergence of an army of “telephone ladies” in countries such as Bangladesh, who earn a decent living by buying a phone and renting it out to other villagers.
That said, some innovations have been harmful to women, especially in the developing world. As the cover story of the latest issue of The Economist points out, at least 100m female lives have been lost in recent decades due to “gendercide” in countries such as China, where the number of live male births recorded enormously exceeds the number of live female births. One factor in this has been new technology that allows parents to determine their embryo’s sex early in a pregnancy—and thus to abort females in countries where male offspring are valued more highly. Other innovations also bring more benefits to men than women. For example, women are estimated to be only 25% of internet users in Africa, 22% in Asia, 38% in Latin America and just 6% in the Middle East.
“How can we harness innovation’s power to empower women and promote greater gender equality?” asks a new study by the International Centre for Research on Women. Its authors try to answer this question first by examining eight inventions that they say have helped women dramatically, including village mobile phones and microcredit.
Another example is the birth-control pill: there is a strong case to be made that it has brought more benefits for women than any other invention, although the report does not attempt such a ranking. The automatic washing-machine might give it a close run in countries where it is commonplace, by freeing women from an activity that used to take many hours a week. Instead of studying that, the report instead considers a number of “social innovations”, ranging from land titling in Peru to the successful anti-foot-binding campaign in China, that the authors say have had a massive beneficial impact.
What makes for a successful pro-women innovation? The report says it is usually the confluence of several positive factors. As with all innovation, a good idea is not enough in itself: it also needs a favourable context, including political, economic and social conditions that make the time right for its adoption, and an innovation system that excels at finding and testing good ideas and quickly scaling them up. But the invention must also have an inherent value that compels women to embrace it—such as the power the Pill gave women over the decision to become pregnant.
Full article on economist.com
Friday, April 17, 2009
more women power... Kenya
Women in Kenya have created a women's village in reaction to female circumsicion and other attrocities. All in the spirit of unite and demand your rights. check out the clip rapported on swedish tv
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
women power in north India
The Gulabi Gang, stands as a women's organisation, working for improving women's situation and taking revenge by thrashing men who have "misbehaved" in the past.
Go girl!
Check out the entry on the I blame the Patriarchy blog.
Go girl!
Check out the entry on the I blame the Patriarchy blog.
Friday, November 14, 2008
no comment
One of these days I got this email sent to me...
Dear mettegabler!
Hi sugar!
European and American women are too arrogant for you? Are you looking for a sweet lady that will be caring and understanding?
Then you came to the right place- here you can find a Russian lady that will love you with all her heart.
Can't find a queen to rule your heart? How about beautiful Russian ladies that have royal blood and royal look?
Here you can find hundreds of portfolios of these fine women of any age for every taste. Please excuse us if you are not interested.
Check our site for more details.
CLICK HERE URL!!
Good bye.
ThEMoc2
Any comments? A discussion would be interesting.
In my mind there are so many thing wrong with this.
But I might be wrong and men just feel abandoned and need some love...
Dear mettegabler!
Hi sugar!
European and American women are too arrogant for you? Are you looking for a sweet lady that will be caring and understanding?
Then you came to the right place- here you can find a Russian lady that will love you with all her heart.
Can't find a queen to rule your heart? How about beautiful Russian ladies that have royal blood and royal look?
Here you can find hundreds of portfolios of these fine women of any age for every taste. Please excuse us if you are not interested.
Check our site for more details.
CLICK HERE URL!!
Good bye.
ThEMoc2
Any comments? A discussion would be interesting.
In my mind there are so many thing wrong with this.
But I might be wrong and men just feel abandoned and need some love...
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
development?
When personlalising your hotmail account something new is there. It looks like this:
Gender:
Female
Male
Prefer not to disclose
This must be the polite version of man, woman, Fuck off! or?
Gender:
Female
Male
Prefer not to disclose
This must be the polite version of man, woman, Fuck off! or?
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Indian short story
Here an excerpt from a story by Amrita Pritam.
On bodies and rotis:I would look at her laughing face. Her body was dark, her flesh like well kneaded dough. They say a woman is like a ball of dough. But sometimes the dough is loose and difficult to roll into the round shape of a roti. Sometimes the dough is stale and impossible to roll out. But there is a sort of woman whose flesh is taut and well toned. One can roll out not just rotis but even puris. I looked at Angoori’s face, her breasts and her arms. Her flesh was tightly kneaded. I had seen her Parbhati too. He was short and withered. He certainly did not deserve to eat such well-kneaded dough... and I laughed at myself for comparing flesh to dough.
The rest of "Wild Flower" can be read on the little magazine.com
On bodies and rotis:I would look at her laughing face. Her body was dark, her flesh like well kneaded dough. They say a woman is like a ball of dough. But sometimes the dough is loose and difficult to roll into the round shape of a roti. Sometimes the dough is stale and impossible to roll out. But there is a sort of woman whose flesh is taut and well toned. One can roll out not just rotis but even puris. I looked at Angoori’s face, her breasts and her arms. Her flesh was tightly kneaded. I had seen her Parbhati too. He was short and withered. He certainly did not deserve to eat such well-kneaded dough... and I laughed at myself for comparing flesh to dough.
The rest of "Wild Flower" can be read on the little magazine.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)